Maine Voices: What if we reorganized car insurance?

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Commission, an estimated 42,915 folks died in motorcar site visitors crashes final 12 months, “a 10.5% increase from the 38,824 fatalities in 2020. The projection is the highest number of fatalities since 2005 and the largest annual percentage increase in the Fatality Analysis Reporting System’s history.”

Those 42,915 folks equal about 74% of the 58,220 Americans who died within the Vietnam War.

There are many causes of car accidents, together with drunken driving, drowsiness, rushing and distracted driving (e.g., texting whereas driving). However, one issue that’s seldom talked about is the truth that insurance will usually cowl your prices, even if you’re at fault. Your premiums will possible rise, however that lies sooner or later.

Overall, then, car insurance entails a switch of cash from those that shouldn’t have accidents to those that do. Viewed on this method, insurance could also be seen to be a case of constructive reinforcement, as described in B.F. Skinner’s 1953 ebook “Science and Human Behavior.”

Without insurance, an at-fault particular person concerned in an accident would undergo quick and huge losses. With insurance, there are few quick monetary losses, though a rise in premiums might nicely happen. Within economics such perverse incentives are known as ethical hazards.

The similar evaluation applies to different types of insurance. For instance, a current Maine Voices column (“Maine Voices: All Mainers need paid family and medical leave – not just some of us,” Oct. 28) made the argument in favor of paid household and medical depart. As the writer, Katrina Ray-Saulis, wrote: “No matter who we are and what we do for a living, we should be able to take time to care for our loved ones when crisis strikes, without risking our jobs or housing, or making other terrible trade-offs.”

In different phrases, if an individual has a sick member of the family, others ought to cowl the prices related to taking time without work from work. (Ray-Saulis doesn’t say that others will cowl the prices. She says that the poll initiative which she is engaged on getting earlier than the voters “would create a fund to pay workers for the time they need – without employers having to bear the cost.”)

Is there a method of getting across the counterproductive results of insurance? Consider the next. An individual who wants car insurance pays premiums on a year-to-year foundation, simply as happens right this moment. However, that cash goes right into a fund that’s owned by the particular person in query. If she or he is at fault in an accident, cash is withdrawn from that fund to cowl the prices. If extra money is required, cash is borrowed from the funds of different such folks.

At retirement, the cash remaining in a single’s fund (which has been incomes compound curiosity due to the loans talked about above) is returned to the proprietor, for use for residing bills – or for every other authorized function. Those who’ve pushed rigorously thus have extra comfy retirements than those that have brought about accidents. Because every particular person covers the price of his or her personal at-fault accidents, we ought to count on fewer accidents involving drunken driving, drowsiness, rushing or distracted driving.

A reorganization of how insurance is structured has the potential to result in fewer freeway accidents and higher well being, to call simply two areas. The extra common message entails folks taking better accountability for issues they trigger, moderately than shifting that accountability onto the shoulders of others.

« Previous

Related Stories