The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, affirming a lower court’s remand to state court, held that a suit filed by a group of plaintiffs against an indemnity company wasn’t a class action despite the fact that a nearly identical class action had previously been filed—and voluntarily dismissed—by some of the same plaintiffs.
Third Circuit Judge D. Brooks Smith, writing for a unanimous three-judge panel, determined that Erie Insurance Exchange’s suit against Erie Indemnity Co. wasn’t a class action as defined by the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), and thus, should be remanded to state court instead of federal court.


![[Toyota Times] From Strengthening Foundations to Boosting Productivity – Toyota Focuses on Break-Even Volume [Toyota Times] From Strengthening Foundations to Boosting Productivity - Toyota Focuses on Break-Even Volume](https://businessfortnight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Toyota-Times-From-Strengthening-Foundations-to-Boosting-Productivity-Toyota-218x150.jpg)



























